Kanban in Government (first retrospective)

Today we did our first retrospective since we changed to Kanban.  These previous weeks have been quite interesting and it was time to improve our flow.

Take a look at the visual workflow we started out with:

What did we notice?

  • The WIP limits were well respected. They raised bottleneck issues and by sticking to the limits, action did happen and the bottleneck got cleared mostly by helping each other out.
  • Some team members who were experienced in Scrum missed the visualization of tasks that come with each feature.
  • We agreed to go over a feature in detail with the analyst and designer when a developer pulls it from ‘Ready for Dev’ to ‘DEV’. This was not always done which lead to misinterpretations and eventually some rework.
  • The team misses a planning meeting.
  • It was hard to use the same ticket throughout the entire flow.  Things got broken up once they entered development which made it more complex to measure flow.
  • Instead of doing the classic daily standup, we now walk the board. Most of the time this takes us longer than it should be.
  • We need progress visualization.

To improve this, we started by optimizing our workflow. This resulted in the following task board:

  • We got rid of some buffers in order to maximize pull.
  • When a feature reaches development it gets split into tasks and comes back to one feature when it is pulled into test and the rest of the flow.  We visualize this with horizontal swim lanes and a WIP limit of 5 features. (The DEV WIP limit has increased to 5 because extra developers have joined).
  • A planning meeting gets pulled when the ‘Ready for Dev’ column gets empty.  At that time, we get together and plan the features that are in the ‘Proposed’ column. These have been analyzed, estimated (t-shirt size) and designed.
  • We added a box for improvement ideas with a WIP limit of 3.  When the limit is reached, we plan a retrospective. I noticed that without a regular sprint cadence, retrospectives tend to be forgotten (and if you know me a little, you know that I can’t really live without them).

There are still a lot of things to improve. One of the most urgent is the visualization of progress. I’m looking if a cumulative flow diagram is sufficient, maybe combined with an SPC chart. If you got any good tips, please let me know.

About Nick Oostvogels

Hi, I'm an independent management consultant. My biggest strengths are located in the fields of teamwork, motivation, leadership and continuous improvement. In the IT industry you find a lot of these values in the agile movement, in which I often act as a project leader, product owner or coach. My interests go a lot further, into other industries where we find these values in lean production. Besides that, I try to broaden my horizon as much as possible, always looking for better ways of doing business.

2 comments

  1. Pingback: Tweets that mention Kanban in Government (first retrospective) « Nick Oostvogels’s Weblog -- Topsy.com

  2. Jef

    Great work! I’d indeed try the cumulative flow diagram. Or just start measuring the lead time for every story by writing start and end date+time on the post-it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: